Remy Froissart, CNRS

Cette page est en lecture seule. Vous pouvez afficher le texte source, mais ne pourrez pas le modifier. Contactez votre administrateur si vous pensez qu'il s'agit d'une erreur.

You requested whether any federal or state laws or proposed laws regulate the sale or use of applied sciences that observe the situation of a cellular phone. You additionally requested a dialogue of legislative choices to deal with this concern. You were primarily enthusiastic about the usage of such units or software by parties aside from law enforcement agencies. Your query was prompted by a constituent whose home was burglarized by a person who used this technology to search out out when the constituent was away from home. Cell phones and other electronic units generate gelocational info that can be utilized to determine the (1) location of the gadgets and their homeowners or (2) sorts of actions a person engages in at a particular location. There are a wide range of commercially accessible technologies that permit events apart from service suppliers to gather and record this knowledge. These technologies can be utilized for benign functions, comparable to tracking a misplaced child,  [[https://humanlove.stream/wiki/User:AntonyTuckson|geofencing alert tool]] as well as criminal functions as apparently happened to your constituent.



(Image: [[https://image.made-in-china.com/2f0j00jBlqOGKaEvcY/Free-Platform-Vehicle-Positioning-Terminal-Relay-Cut-off-Fuel-Carro-Tracking-Device.jpg|https://image.made-in-china.com/2f0j00jBlqOGKaEvcY/Free-Platform-Vehicle-Positioning-Terminal-Relay-Cut-off-Fuel-Carro-Tracking-Device.jpg]])We haven't discovered any federal or state legal guidelines that specifically address the sale or use of technologies that monitor  [[http://youtools.pt/mw/index.php?title=Who_Can_Find_My_Devices|iTagPro key finder]] the location of a cellphone or different gelocational knowledge. But there is laws pending in Congress and  [[http://www.theycallmedaymz.com/jojo-triumphs/|iTagPro official]] California in this space. Four payments (S. 1212, H.R. 2168, S. 1223, and H.R. 1895) have been introduced in Congress this session to regulate the acquisition and use of geolocational data. S. 1212 and H.R. 2168 (companion bills) make it a federal crime to deliberately intercept geolocation information pertaining to another individual or to disclose or use that information. The payments have quite a lot of exceptions, akin to collecting information on one other individual along with his or her consent, accumulating data in connection with a theft, and overseas intelligence surveillance. The bills modify the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to require a search warrant for a legislation enforcement agency to acquire geolocation info. They allow a person whose geolocation data is intercepted, disclosed, or deliberately utilized in violation of the bill to recuperate civil damages.



S. 1223 makes it a federal crime for a nongovernmental individual or entity engaged in the business of providing or providing a service to electronic communications devices from knowingly accumulating, acquiring, or disclosing to a nongovernmental particular person or entity geolocation data from an electronic communications machine without the categorical authorization of the person using the system. The bill prohibits the: (1) unauthorized disclosure of geolocation data in help of interstate domestic violence or stalking and (2) sale of geolocation data relating to youngsters beneath age 11. However, it permits geolocation information to be tracked as a way to find a minor little one or provide fireplace, medical, public security, or different emergency services, among different things. The invoice authorizes civil actions by the U.S. H.R. 1895 requires the Federal Trade Commission to adopt laws on the gathering of geolocational information from minors. The regulations must require an operator of a web site, on-line service, on-line application,  [[https://timeoftheworld.date/wiki/I_Live_In_A_Giant_City|geofencing alert tool]] or mobile utility directed to minors to supply clear and conspicuous notice in clear and plain language of any geolocation data the operator collects,  [[http://www.ihaorankeji.cn/silke93x205007/silke2020/wiki/TIRF+USA+-+CDOT+Cognitive+Roadside+Device+Evaluation+Study.-|geofencing alert tool]] how it makes use of the knowledge, and  [[http://naturalfd.co.kr/g5/bbs/board.php?bo_table=free&wr_id=355155|geofencing alert tool]] whether it discloses the information.
(Image: [[https://whysurfswim.files.wordpress.com/2018/06/hand2.png?w=257|https://whysurfswim.files.wordpress.com/2018/06/hand2.png?w=257]])


The operator must receive a verifiable parental consent earlier than accumulating the information from a minor. After accumulating the knowledge, the operators should give the mother or father or a baby, upon request, an outline of the information collected and the chance at any time to refuse to permit the additional use or upkeep in retrievable type, or  [[http://c.daum7.net/bbs/board.php?bo_table=free&wr_id=2842766|itagpro bluetooth]] future collection, of information from a child. Tracking laws is pending in California. SB 761 requires the adoption of regulations to require a person or entity doing business in California that collects, makes use of,  [[https://omnideck.org/index.php/Track_And_Monitor_Device_Movement_With_AirDroid_Business_MDM_Geofencing|geofencing alert tool]] or  [[https://funsilo.date/wiki/User:LEEMaximo4702|smart item locator]] shops certain types of data to supply individuals with a method to choose out of that assortment, use, and storage of such info. The invoice has extra stringent requirements concerning "sensitive data," which incorporates the consumer's location and any details about the individual's activities and relationships associated with that location, e.g., what an individual typically does at a given location. An entity that willfully violates the rules is liable to the affected particular person in a civil action for  [[https://manchestercityclubs.nl/the-origins-and-evolution-of-sagan-tosu-fc/|geofencing alert tool]] precise damages, with a $one hundred minimal and $1,000 maximum, plus punitive damages because the court may allow.



Connecticut law doesn't specifically deal with the usage of tracking technologies and it is unclear whether present Connecticut legislation applies. For example, in the case that prompted your question, it might be argued that the burglar violated CGS § 53a-106, which bars the manufacture or possession of burglar's tools. Other laws that might apply embrace people who prohibit wiretapping and laptop crimes. The legislature has many choices concerning the possession and use of monitoring expertise. It might modify existing criminal laws to make them apply to certain uses of tracking technologies, create new criminal offenses, or create a trigger of motion for folks injured by the illicit use of the applied sciences. For instance, the legislature might: (1) specify that the possession of the tracking know-how by parties other than service suppliers or regulation enforcement agencies violates CGS § 53a-106, (2) create a brand new offense of possessing or  [[https://chessdatabase.science/wiki/Tail_It_Bike_GPS_Tracking_Device|iTagPro]] using the technology within the furtherance of crimes akin to burglary, or (3) make the use or possession of the know-how an aggravating circumstance of such crimes as stalking, that subjects an offender to a higher penalty than in any other case applies.
Remy Froissart, CNRS

Outils pour utilisateurs

Outils du site

Outils de la page
